Water firms sent bailiffs to tens of thousands of homes for debts under 1,000

"Tens of thousands of people a year have bailiffs sent to their homes by water companies in England and Wales, data shows. Many thousands of these visits by debt collectors were for sums worth under 1,000, according to the data released by the House of Commons environment, food and rural affairs (Efra) committee. Bailiffs are debt collectors instructed by a court, who can seize items from those in debt, including electrical items, jewellery or vehicles."

"It is a postcode lottery as to whether a water company would send a bailiff to a person's home to recoup unpaid bills. While Wessex Water has not used bailiffs in 10 years, the water companies that made the most use of bailiffs in 2025 adjusted for population were South West Water, Southern Water and Yorkshire Water."

"The criteria for sending debt collectors to people's homes varies between water companies. For example, Northumbrian Water told the committee it did not send bailiffs to homes where residents were known to be in receipt of means-tested benefits, whereas Southern Water said these customers were eligible for litigation. Severn Trent also does not perform checks on whether someone is in receipt of means-tested benefits before instructing a bailiff."

"The use of bailiffs by water companies that had been found to have broken the law themselves was unfair, the Labour MP John McDonnell said. He said: Only five directors of water companies have been prosecuted in the last 30 years. Contrast that with the thousands of mainly po"

Water companies in England and Wales send tens of thousands of bailiffs to customers' homes annually to collect unpaid bills, with many visits involving debts under £1,000. Bailiff usage varies dramatically between companies and regions, creating a postcode lottery effect. Yorkshire Water increased visits from 405 in 2016-17 to 6,124 in 2024-25, while Wessex Water has not used bailiffs in a decade. Enforcement criteria differ significantly: some companies like Northumbrian Water exempt means-tested benefit recipients, while others like Southern Water pursue them through litigation. Protections for vulnerable groups are inconsistent, with only some companies exempting those with dementia or critical illness. Critics argue water companies' aggressive debt collection practices are hypocritical given their own legal violations.

Read at www.theguardian.com