On February 4, 2025, Lucy Letby's barrister held a press conference asserting potential flaws in her convictions for murder. Dr. Shoo Lee, an esteemed Canadian neonatologist, presented evidence that disputed the prosecution's case, claiming that deaths attributed to Letby were likely due to natural causes or poor medical care. Lee expressed concern over the misuse of his research in the prosecution, stating that it led to a wrongful conviction. Despite his willingness to present new evidence, the appeal court dismissed it as irrelevant, prompting him to assemble a panel of experts to scrutinize the case further.
Dr. Shoo Lee stated, 'We did not find any murders. In all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care.'
Leeâs involvement stems from realizing that a medical paper he authored was misused for a crucial prosecution claim, leading him to question the validity of Letbyâs conviction.
Collection
[
|
...
]