Hamit Coskun was convicted for burning a Quran outside the Turkish consulate in London, deemed a religiously aggravated public order offence. During his act, he made offensive remarks about Islam. The court, presided by Judge John McGarva, emphasized that Coskun’s actions were driven by a long-standing animosity towards Islam, rooted in his life experiences. He was fined for disorderly behavior, with significant discourse surrounding freedom of speech and religious sensitivity. Coskun argued the conviction threatened democratic expression, while critics expressed concern over legal thresholds for such prosecutions.
The court found Hamit Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence after he burned a copy of the Quran, demonstrating deep-seated animosity towards Islam.
Judge John McGarva remarked that the defendant's conduct was highly provocative, revealing his motivations were influenced by personal experiences and led to disorderly behavior.
Coskun argued that his actions were a protest against the Turkish government and freedom of speech, claiming it constituted an 'assault on free speech'.
A spokesperson from Humanists UK expressed concerns that the prosecution raised issues about the thresholds for legal actions against expressions deemed offensive, highlighting a potential chilling effect on free speech.
Collection
[
|
...
]