The International Court of Justice is set to rule on Sudan's accusations against the UAE regarding complicity in genocide linked to arms shipments to Sudan's Rapid Support Forces during the civil war. Sudan asserts that without UAE's support, the genocide would be impossible. The UAE, claiming that the allegations are fabrications, argues that a prior reservation to the genocide convention prevents the ICJ from ruling on its responsibilities. The case raises broader concerns about external influences in the Sudan conflict and could pressure partners to reconsider their involvement.
The international court of justice will rule on whether the United Arab Emirates can be found complicit in genocide by arming Sudan's Rapid Support Forces in the ongoing civil war.
Sudan's acting justice minister stated that the UAE's complicity in arms shipments to the RSF is crucial for the ongoing genocide, and seeks reparations.
The UAE claims that the allegations are misleading fabrications, denying that it is a driving force in the conflict and asserting its rights under the genocide convention.
The case highlights concerns around external influences in Sudan's civil conflict and may push external partners to reconsider their support for warring factions.
Collection
[
|
...
]