"Recently, I came across a YouTube video by Volvo on how they studied how drivers responded to different fonts. I was surprised that the video only got around 70k views, and I think this is very interesting given how often small design decisions, such as typography, are overlooked."
"All of those metrics are typically associated with designing engaging interfaces that deliver value by reducing errors and friction points. But all of those things ultimately tie to metrics of engagement."
"But seeing a car manufacturer treat a font like a piece of safety hardware changes how I look at my own work."
"Since the beginning of my UX Design journey, I was always taught about making designs "usable", "engaging", "having a clear value proposition for shareholders", and "measuring impact"."
Volvo examined how drivers react to different fonts and how typography influences safety. The work frames typeface as a functional element comparable to safety hardware rather than a purely aesthetic choice. Typography affects how quickly and accurately drivers can perceive information, especially when attention varies. Design goals such as usability, engagement, and measurable impact connect to reducing errors and friction. These outcomes relate to engagement metrics because clearer information supports better decision-making. The approach encourages designers to consider how small visual decisions can change real-world performance and safety outcomes for drivers.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]