"When NBA trades take place, they almost always fit a basic paradigm: one team is making a move focused on winning games in the present, while the other team is sacrificing their ability to win games in the present in order to increase their chances of winning games in the future. Sometimes those are massive shifts, such as when a superstar is traded for a boatload of picks and prospects and their former team enters a rebuild; other times they are more subtle, a team retooling for the very next season by selling a veteran role player to a team contending this season."
"To look at Morant and conclude he is a star talent who would fit well on the Raptors, however, is to look at him without your glasses on. It would be the blurry outline of the player he has become. Trading for Morant would mean adding a player who would be a downgrade on Immanuel Quickley and paying a premium to do it."
The Toronto Raptors have been linked to Ja Morant, but acquiring him would harm present and future prospects. NBA trades commonly exchange immediate competitiveness for future assets, and the Raptors have targeted players who could undermine long-term success without clearly improving current contention. Anthony Davis exemplifies a risky fit because of injuries, shooting limitations, and an onerous contract. Ja Morant appears buy-low but would actually be a downgrade relative to Immanuel Quickley while demanding a premium return. Such a trade would worsen roster fit, reduce floor spacing beside Scottie Barnes, and compromise future flexibility and sustained contention.
Read at Raptors Rapture
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]