"Save $1,000 on the 65-inch when you buy directly from Samsung. The is an impressive update to the brand's OLED TV offerings, with an improved glare-free display, ultra-thin build, and AI-assisted picture and audio processing. With Samsung's One Connect Box, you can use a single cable to connect all your playback devices for an ultra-clean, almost entirely wireless home theater setup. But since a premium build often comes with a premium price tag, is the S95F worth the upgrade?"
"I tested the TV out of ZDNET's Louisville lab last year, and it was suffice to say at the time that the Samsung S95F was and still is one of the best TVs on the market. This is a stellar option for those willing to spend and those looking for a worthy TV deal, especially if the latest S95H model isn't your cup of tea."
"The Pantone-validated screen helps improve color accuracy across a variety of media, including classic black-and-white Hollywood films. While our Calman calibration testing showed a noticeable blue shift in color, the AI-assisted picture mode, along with a handful of standard picture settings, helps correct it. And if you don't mind a little blue tint to your media, the S95F still looks amazing right out of the box, with a bright, clean picture that produces deep blacks for sharper contrast and handles fine details with ease."
The Samsung S95F is an impressive update to the brand's OLED offerings, featuring an improved glare-free display, ultra-thin build, and AI-assisted picture and audio processing. A 65-inch model is $1,000 off when purchased directly from Samsung. Samsung's One Connect Box enables a single-cable connection for an ultra-clean, nearly wireless home theater setup. The Pantone-validated screen improves color accuracy across varied media, though Calman calibration testing showed a noticeable blue shift; AI-assisted picture mode and standard picture settings help correct it. The S95F delivers bright, clean images, deep blacks, sharp contrast, and finer detailing compared with competing models.
Read at ZDNET
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]