8 takeaways from a so-so Emmys night
Briefly

8 takeaways from a so-so Emmys night
"Bargatze introduced his disastrous evening-long bit by taking several boring minutes to claim that he would donate $100,000 to the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, but would take away money if winners' speeches went over 45 seconds. This is an ugly idea, mean and counterproductive. People watch awards shows to see the awards, and most would probably rather you cut the host and presenter yammering."
"Throughout the evening, as the winners were speaking, an onscreen graphic showed the amount of money going to charity decreasing in real time. It was distracting and repetitive and kind of insulting, and Bargatze just kept bringing it up over ... and over ... and over. (Of course the charity got all the money at the end. Everyone knew they would. The point wasn't to give or not give the money; it was to give the host a bit that he could reference repeatedly"
The Emmy Awards night awarded many prizes to a few shows, with The Studio dominating comedy categories, Adolescence sweeping limited series categories, and The Pitt winning the top drama prize. Host Nate Bargatze opened with stale jokes and ran a repetitive charity gag promising $100,000 to Boys and Girls Clubs but threatening to subtract money for lengthy speeches. The on-screen countdown graphic proved distracting and insulting. Presenters stumbled, including a mispronunciation of Tramell Tillman's name and a muddled introduction of Gilmore Girls. Production felt low-energy and poorly executed, prioritizing bits over winners and speeches.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]