Google didn't silence its biggest critic - it contractually converted him into an advocate - Silicon Canals

"The binding settlement term sheet does more than end the Epic v. Google legal saga. It restructures the economic terms of the Play Store. It opens Android to alternative app stores. And buried in the fine print, it reportedly contains a clause that should interest anyone who thinks about how corporate power actually operates: Sweeney must not only stop attacking Google publicly, but actively advocate that Google's platform is "procompetitive and a model for app store / platform operations.""

"The man who reportedly called Google and Apple "gangster-style businesses" and described Google's Project Hug as "an astonishingly corrupt effort at a massive scale" is now contractually obligated to say the opposite."

"The non-disparagement clause operates on a different level entirely. It doesn't just require Sweeney to stop criticizing Google. The contract language reportedly states that "Epic believes that the Google and Android platform, with the changes in this term sheet, are procompetitive and a model for app store / platform operations, and will make good faith efforts to advocate for the same.""

Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games and prominent antitrust critic, settled his legal dispute with Google with terms restructuring the Play Store's economics and opening Android to alternative app stores. Beyond economic concessions like reduced commission fees and a Registered App Store program, the settlement contains a non-disparagement clause requiring Sweeney to stop criticizing Google and actively advocate that Google's platform is procompetitive and a model for app store operations. This contractual obligation contradicts Sweeney's previous public statements characterizing Google and Apple as corrupt businesses. The clause represents a significant constraint on corporate criticism and raises questions about how settlements can silence industry voices.

Read at Silicon Canals