Can your cloud provider really scale?
Briefly

On July 29, 2025, Microsoft Azure's East US region experienced significant service disruption due to insufficient capacity amidst a surge in demand. This issue affected numerous enterprises relying on Azure, causing failed virtual machine allocations. Although Microsoft managed to mark the issue as resolved by August 5, residual challenges were reported. Such disruptions are not isolated cases but part of a worrying trend, emphasizing the vulnerabilities of public cloud systems. Companies are urged to rethink strategies and enforce stricter service level agreements (SLAs) as the cloud infrastructure reflects typical physical limitations.
On July 29, 2025, enterprises relying on Microsoft Azure's East US region experienced an unexpected disruption that reverberated across numerous organizations. The root cause wasn't a network breach, misconfiguration, or other complex technical mishap. It was something shockingly basic: a lack of capacity.
This Azure incident wasn't an anomaly. In the past few years, such capacity-related outages have become more prevalent, impacting various public cloud providers. Enterprises were assured that cloud environments were engineered to scale automatically and effortlessly.
Organizations are increasingly finding themselves grappling with the hard truth: The public cloud isn't some magic infrastructure immune to the challenges of physical systems; the cloud is simply someone else's computer, with all the usual limitations.
Enterprises must recognize this and account for the possibility—the inevitability—of failures in scalability. Public cloud providers built their reputations on a simple yet powerful claim of instant scalability up or down in response to user demand.
Read at InfoWorld
[
|
]