"An engineer refreshes a pull request page for the fourth time. New comments appear. More reviewers get tagged. The change has been ready for days, yet the approval waits. The scenario is familiar across the industry: code that takes 15 minutes to write but 15 days to get approved. The frustration isn't rooted in disagreement about quality or safety. Engineers want to ship something straightforward, yet find themselves navigating comments, reviews, alignment meetings, and status threads."
"If you've ever watched a pull request spend more time in discussion than it took to build the feature, you've seen the quiet cost of process at scale. Governance starts with good intent. It brings clarity and protects quality. But beyond a certain point, it dilutes ownership, slows execution, and drains morale. Software organizations don't slow down because people stop caring."
"The pattern plays out similarly across companies scaling past a few hundred engineers. Early on, things move quickly because ownership is clear. Then growth creates new pressures. A deployment causes an outage and leadership adds oversight. A security vulnerability reaches production and suddenly every change requires security review. Each response makes sense in isolation. The problem emerges when organizations keep adding layers without removing them. Architecture review boards and launch readiness checklists accumulate without pruning and expand to include every senior voice."
Governance begins with good intent and can bring clarity and protect quality. As organizations scale, responsibility spreads across owners, reviewers, and committees, increasing friction and slowing delivery. Incidents prompt added oversight, and security and architecture checks multiply without corresponding removals. Accumulated sign-off layers dilute ownership, lengthen approval cycles, and create emotional overcorrections after visible problems. The cumulative cost shows up as features that take far longer to approve than to build. Leaders must continuously tune governance so that clarity and speed improve together rather than trading one for the other.
Read at InfoWorld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]