I Tested 5 AI Coding Tools So You Don't Have To
Briefly

I Tested 5 AI Coding Tools So You Don't Have To
"Cursor impressed me with its real-time visualization and intelligent code suggestions. Recent comparisons show that Cursor is adopted by 7 million developers and Fortune 1000 companies, and I could see why: when it worked. The problem? Debugging in Xcode felt like trying to perform surgery with oven mitts. For someone lacking coding fundamentals, Cursor's power becomes a liability because I'm unsure which part it's executing correctly and how to maintain that code."
"Lovable delivered on aesthetics. The UI was gorgeous, and the development experience felt polished and beginner-friendly. Industry reports consistently rank Lovable among the most accessible options for beginners, and I can confirm the visual editor is intuitive. But then came the map feature, the core of my app. Despite the platform's promises of comprehensive functionality, integrating location services required connecting to external APIs that demanded payment. For a simple prototype, this felt like hitting a blocker before I could even validate my idea."
Cursor provides real-time visualization and intelligent code suggestions and is adopted by millions of developers and large enterprises when it functions reliably. Deep debugging in environments like Xcode can be awkward, and automation can obscure execution details for those without coding fundamentals, complicating maintenance. Lovable prioritizes polished UI and beginner-friendly visual editing but requires paid external APIs for core features like maps, blocking quick prototypes. Replit emphasizes functional delivery over aesthetics, supporting navigation, data persistence, and visualizations suitable for iterative learning. Bolt produced inconsistent and frustrating results in testing, limiting its usefulness.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]