F# 10 features scoped warning suppression
Briefly

F# 10 features scoped warning suppression
"The newest version of Microsoft's multi-paradigm language features a much-sought ability to suppress warnings in specified code sections. With the scoped warning suppression capability, the compiler now supports the #warnon directive, which is paired with #nowarn to disable or enable warnings within a specific code span. The F# 10 update was introduced along with .NET 10 on November 11. Developers can get F# 10 by downloading .NET 10 or by accessing Visual Studio 2026 Insiders."
"F# 10 also allows developers to apply distinct access modifiers to individual property accessors. This capability allows developers to specify access levels for the getter and setter of a property inline, enabling common patterns such as publicly readable but privately mutable state without verbose boilerplate. Another new capability in F# 10 enables optional parameters to use a struct-based ValueOption<'T> representation. By applying the [<Struct>] attribute to an optional parameter, developers can instruct the compiler to use ValueOption<'T> instead of the reference-based option type."
F# 10 introduces scoped warning suppression using paired #warnon and #nowarn directives to disable or enable warnings within specific code spans. The compiler supports the #warnon directive alongside #nowarn, improving control over warning behavior, though related consistency changes may be breaking for some codebases. F# 10 allows distinct access modifiers on individual property accessors, enabling inline getter/setter access level specification and common patterns like public read, private write without boilerplate. Optional parameters can use a struct-based ValueOption by applying the [<Struct>] attribute, avoiding a heap allocation for the option wrapper in performance-sensitive scenarios. F# 10 released with .NET 10 on November 11 and is available via .NET 10 or Visual Studio 2026 Insiders. Other improvements include additional language and compiler enhancements.
Read at InfoWorld
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]