"Some, though, are quietly stepping off the hype train. Whereas the steady stream of new programming languages once attracted all the attention, lately it's more common to find older languages like Ada and C reclaiming their top spots in the popular language indexes. Yes, these rankings are far from perfect, but they're a good litmus test of the respect some senior (even ancient) programming languages still command."
"For one thing, rewriting old code in some shiny new language often introduces more bugs than it fixes. The logic in software doesn't wear out or rot over time. So why toss away perfectly debugged code just so we can slurp up the latest syntactic sugar? Sure, the hipsters in their cool startups might laugh, but they'll burn through their seed round in a few quarters, anyway. Meanwhile, the megacorps keep paying real dividends on their piles of old code. Now who's smarter?"
Newer programming languages attract attention, but older languages continue to hold important roles in development. Mature languages are often more reliable because long-tested code avoids the introduction of bugs that can occur during rewrites. Legacy codebases remain valuable assets for corporations that derive ongoing returns from stable software. Many older languages have evolved with modern features such as object-oriented capabilities, maintained by dedicated teams that release newer versions. Continued maintenance removes the necessity to abandon proven systems or chase transient trends. Choosing older languages can be a pragmatic decision based on stability, existing investments, and practical feature updates.
Read at InfoWorld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]