"The language is that of invisible ink, fake beards and newspapers with holes cut in them. Can I borrow a match?' I use a lighter.' Even the suggestion that the spy was a lone wolf, a rogue operative, makes the whole thing seem ridiculous. What next? Lamplighters? Scalphunters? Pavement artists? Bugs in the dressing room? Sleepers planted in rivals' youth systems ready to bring down clubs from the inside?"
Middlesbrough manager Kim Hellberg reacted strongly after a defeat, describing tactics as the main advantage available to less well-resourced teams. He felt betrayed when carefully prepared strategies were made ineffective by alleged cheating through espionage rather than normal in-game competition. The impact of spying is debated, with some doubting its value and others arguing that specific pressing or set-piece plans could be decisive. The discussion is complicated by the farcical tone of reported details, including disguises and staged spying scenarios. The idea of lone operators also contributes to a sense of absurdity, raising questions about what could come next in the escalation of alleged deception.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]