Manchester United want to sign Joao Gomes as Liverpool walk away
Briefly

"Napoli have lined up Joao Gomes as a major target for the summer, but there's no deal in place yet. The club is said to have a verbal understanding with the player on the financial framework, though talks with Wolverhampton haven't progressed. That suggests a move is more likely in June, with January only possible if the right conditions fall into place."
"There's also clear movement around Atletico Madrid. Simeone is pushing for a midfielder who suits his system, intense pressing, strong in duels, and Joao Gomes has moved up their shortlist. While there are internal concerns over cost, interest remains active, and contacts via the player's camp keep the file warm. Atletico are expected to look for an opening in January, while planning a broader push for the summer."
"Manchester United have tracked Joao Gomes since the summer and see him as a profile to add energy, aggression, and coverage in midfield in a post-Casemiro setup. Sources have informed CaughtOffside that scouting reports are positive and suggest he's well-suited to Premier League tempo. Crystal Palace have also noted Gomes among options to cover an injury-hit midfield, with a loan or cost-effective solution in January under consideration. Liverpool's earlier interest has cooled recently. Financially, Wolves are expected to demand a high valuation."
Napoli view Joao Gomes as a major summer midfield target and reportedly have a verbal financial understanding with the player. Talks with Wolverhampton have not progressed because Wolves value the player highly, reducing the likelihood of a January permanent move. Atletico and Manchester United have active interest, seeing Gomes as an intense, ball-winning midfielder who fits their systems. Crystal Palace consider a loan or economical January option to cover injuries. A loan with an option or obligation to buy is the most realistic January structure, while a straight permanent deal is likelier in the summer.
Read at www.caughtoffside.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]