Eberechi Eze had a goal disallowed in what may be his last game for Palace, who successfully defended against Chelsea, limiting their scoring chances. The disallowed goal sparked controversy regarding the decision, with a focus on an infringement by Guehi that interfered with defenders. Many Palace fans might feel unjust as other goals have stood despite similar infractions. The ruling itself was deemed correct as it upholds the law preventing interference. Guehi's actions immediately before the goal contributed to the decision, reinforcing the importance of proximity in these situations.
Eberechi Eze had a goal disallowed in what might be his final game for Palace, who defended superbly and restricted Chelsea to few goalscoring opportunities.
Palace fans may feel aggrieved by other goals standing despite infractions, yet it was surely right that the goal was disallowed. The correct call was made.
The law is there to prevent interference with defenders. Guehi interfered and then got close to the wall, justifying the disallowed goal.
Guehi's proximity to defenders and subsequent contact led to the disallowed goal, emphasizing that such infractions should not be overlooked.
Collection
[
|
...
]