Why the military is obsessed with the myth of the 'infinite magazine'

"While this framing is technically accurate in a narrow sense, it is also operationally misleading. Laser weapons do not defeat targets by expending discrete rounds, but by occupying time-and time, in combat, is always finite."

"The vast majority of military laser weapons currently in development or operationally deployed are continuous wave systems, which disable or destroy incoming threats by focusing energy on a single point long enough to inflict catastrophic damage. This requires consistent and sustained contact between a laser beam and its intended target, typically measured in seconds."

"Unlike, say, a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile battery, which can launch multiple interceptors in rapid succession, a single-beam laser weapon must queue its engagements and commit several seconds to defeat each incoming target, leaving it unavailable to address other threats."

High-energy laser weapons are promoted as having decisive advantages, including an 'infinite magazine' capability since they don't require physical ammunition reloads. However, this claim is operationally misleading. Most military laser weapons are continuous wave systems that disable targets by focusing energy on a single point for sustained periods, typically several seconds. This required dwell time means the system cannot engage multiple targets simultaneously. Unlike conventional air defense systems such as THAAD missile batteries that can launch multiple interceptors rapidly, single-beam laser weapons must queue engagements sequentially. Consequently, while lasers may not run out of ammunition, they face a fundamental constraint: time availability in combat is finite, making dwell time the actual limiting factor rather than ammunition supply.

Read at Fast Company