"It ain't no unicorn": These researchers have interviewed 130 Bigfoot hunters

"It was the image that launched a cultural icon. In 1967, in the Northern California woods, a 7-foot-tall, ape-like creature covered in black fur and walking upright was captured on camera, at one point turning around to look straight down the lens. The image is endlessly copied in popular culture-it's even become an emoji. But what was it? A hoax? A bear? Or a real-life example of a mysterious species called the Bigfoot?"

"The film has been analysed and re-analysed countless times. Although most people believe it was some sort of hoax, there are some who argue that it's never been definitively debunked. One group of people, dubbed Bigfooters, is so intrigued that they have taken to the forests of Washington, California, Oregon, Ohio, Florida, and beyond to look for evidence of the mythical creature."

"But why? That's what sociologists Jamie Lewis and Andrew Bartlett wanted to uncover. They were itching to understand what prompts this community to spend valuable time and resources looking for a beast that is highly unlikely to even exist. During lockdown, Lewis started interviewing more than 130 Bigfooters (and a few academics) about their views, experiences, and practices, culminating in the duo's recent book "Bigfooters and Scientific Inquiry: On the Borderlands of Legitimate Science.""

A 1967 photograph of an upright, ape-like figure became a persistent cultural icon and prompted repeated analysis and debate about its origin. Many observers regard the image as a hoax, while some maintain it has not been conclusively debunked. A community known as Bigfooters conducts organized searches across multiple US states, pursuing physical evidence and sharing experiences. Extensive interviews with over 130 Bigfooters and some academics examined motivations, practices, and social dynamics within the community. Mainstream media exposure and televised search programs helped sustain interest and motivated deeper investigation into why people commit resources to the pursuit.

Read at Ars Technica