An analysis determined that 45 editors at PLoS ONE, while handling only 1.3% of the journal's articles, were linked to over 30% of the 702 retracted papers by early 2024. Among these editors, 25 also authored retracted papers. The study raised concerns about systemic issues amid editorial complicity in overseeing publications. PLOS acknowledged ongoing awareness of these issues and stated that actions have been taken against implicated editors. Commentary from experts highlights the need for integrity and available tools to address publication misconduct across the industry.
The analysis found that 45 editors handled only 1.3% of all articles published by PLoS ONE from 2006 to 2023, yet accepted over 30% of the 702 retractions issued by the journal by early 2024.
Reese Richardson states, "The footprints that systematic fraud leaves in the literature are so massive that there's no way that it's just a couple of bad authors; there is complicity from within the journal-appointed editors that allows for this to happen."
Renee Hoch, head of publication ethics at PLOS, stated that the publisher has promptly removed those of concern from editorial boards and taken necessary actions on affected articles.
Cassidy Sugimoto expresses disheartenment at the findings but acknowledges them as a demonstration of tools available to enhance publication integrity.
Collection
[
|
...
]