"If you've worked with big data long enough, you know that the smallest syntax differences can have massive performance or logic implications.That's especially true when working in Spark with Scala, where functional transformations like map and flatMap control how data moves, expands, or contracts across clusters."
"Scala's functional style makes Spark transformations elegant and concise, but only if you really understand what's happening under the hood. In this post, I'll walk you through how I think about map vs flatMap in real-world Spark pipelines, using examples from the same books dataset I've used in previous stories."
"case class Book(title: String, author: String, category: String, rating: Double)val books = sc.parallelize(Seq( Book("Sapiens", "Yuval Harari", "Non-fiction", 4.6), Book("The Selfish Gene", "Richard Dawkins", "Science", 4.4), Book("Clean Code", "Robert Martin", "Programming", 4.8), Book("The Pragmatic Programmer", "Andrew Hunt", "Programming", 4.7), Book("Thinking, Fast and Slow", "Daniel Kahneman"..."
Map produces exactly one output element for each input element, preserving input cardinality. FlatMap produces zero or more outputs per input, allowing expansion or contraction of records and flattening nested collections. FlatMap is appropriate when splitting fields into multiple records or filtering out empty results, while map is appropriate for one-to-one transformations. Misusing flatMap can inflate data volume, increase shuffles, and cause memory pressure; misusing map can leave unwanted nesting or optional values intact. Choosing the correct transformation influences correctness, cluster resource usage, and overall pipeline performance in Spark with Scala.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]