Why changing the Endangered Species Act's definition of 'harm' would undo key protections

The Trump administration has proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act that could alter the interpretation of the term "harm," potentially permitting habitat destruction of endangered and threatened species. For 50 years, this Act has effectively protected species from direct harm and habitat loss, both vital for their survival. The current definition of harm includes actions that lead to habitat destruction. Experts have raised alarms that this regulatory change could lead to increased risks for already endangered species. Public comments on the proposal are open until May 19, 2025.

The Trump administration is proposing to change the interpretation of "harm" in the Endangered Species Act, potentially allowing for habitat destruction without consequence.

For 50 years, the Endangered Species Act has protected endangered species from both direct killing and habitat destruction, which is vital for their survival.

Read at Fast Company