VA Dems Are Frustrated With Spanberger's Veto of Legislation Reining in ICE
Briefly

VA Dems Are Frustrated With Spanberger's Veto of Legislation Reining in ICE
Within 24 hours, Gov. Abigail Spanberger vetoed two legislative packages aimed at limiting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Virginia, while signing other measures targeting masked federal agents. She also issued a sweeping executive order governing how ICE officers may operate on state property. Some Democratic lawmakers expressed frustration, saying the actions sent conflicting signals during growing fear about ICE operations across Virginia. Spanberger has tried to balance criticism of federal immigration enforcement tactics with resistance to proposals she says could create legal conflicts, public safety concerns, or unintended consequences. The vetoes included House Bill 1392 and Senate Bill 83, which addressed courthouse security procedures, attorney access, and electronic device policies, with Spanberger citing insufficient study and unclear public safety benefits.
"Gov. Abigail Spanberger within just 24 hours vetoed two legislative packages aimed at limiting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Virginia while simultaneously signing other measures targeting masked federal agents and issuing a sweeping executive order governing how ICE officers may operate on state property."
"The moves highlighted the careful line Spanberger has tried to maintain during her first six months in office. She has repeatedly criticized federal immigration enforcement tactics while resisting proposals she argues could create legal conflicts, public safety concerns or unintended consequences."
"Among the most controversial vetoes were House Bill 1392 and Senate Bill 83, companion measures focused on courthouse security procedures, attorney access and electronic device policies in Virginia courthouses. While the legislation itself focused on courthouse operations and attorney access, some supporters and immigrant-rights advocates previously argued the measures could also help reduce fears surrounding immigration enforcement activity at courthouses."
"Spanberger rejected the measures, saying she was unconvinced they would improve safety. "Without additional study or a clear public safety benefit, I do no""
Read at Truthout
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]