Gavin Newsom faces challenges in his legal battle against President Trump regarding the federalization of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. A federal judge affirmed that Trump's deployment of troops exceeded his executive authority, but a Ninth Circuit Court panel expressed skepticism about California's position. The judges questioned the state's claims and the legal framework surrounding presidential powers, suggesting possible limitations on the ability to challenge such actions. The case reflects ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities amidst civil unrest.
Even if there were reasons why this decision by the president should have been counseled against, was there anything in the law saying he was not entitled to make these decisions? Judge Sung's question highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding presidential power.
While presidents have, in the past, deployed National Guard troops in times of civil unrest, Trump did so using a rarely used law that requires the move to go through a state governor.
Collection
[
|
...
]