In a California federal court case, Judge Jon S. Tigar expressed skepticism towards the Trump administration's justification of executive orders that LGBTQ+ advocates argue suppress crucial speech and endanger vital services. The orders, which were criticized for being excessively vague, include directives that challenge the recognition of transgender identities and dismantle programs focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion. As Lambda Legal presented its case, emphasis was placed on potential constitutional violations concerning First and Fifth Amendment rights, mainly how these orders could significantly impact the lives of LGBTQ+ individuals.
"To me, that sounds incredibly vague," Tigar told DOJ attorney Pardis Gheibi, after she declined to clearly define what counts as 'gender ideology.'"
"LGBTQ+ organizations immediately warned that the moves were designed to erase trans people from public life."
"The lawsuit stems from a series of executive orders signed by President Donald Trump during his first week back in office this January."
"Lambda Legal's Camilla Taylor argued the orders violate the First Amendment by chilling protected speech and the Fifth Amendment by targeting transgender individuals."
Collection
[
|
...
]