"The cheaper it is, the better, but the appeal of massed weaponry is not just because they're cheap. There are operational effects. Mass allows for failures, losses, and ineffective outcomes."
"You need to throw enough that you shut down their system and then exploit that gap. The real value of that mass of low-cost weaponry is that it allows militaries to overwhelm enemy defenses."
"For decades, the West has heavily prioritized smaller quantities of advanced but expensive systems built for precision, not mass. But Ukraine's experience against Russia has forced a rethink."
Ukraine's conflict with Russia has demonstrated the strategic importance of cheap weaponry in warfare. Massed low-cost arms allow militaries to absorb losses and maintain offensive pressure. Retired Air Marshal Greg Bagwell emphasizes that the appeal of mass is not solely due to cost but also operational effectiveness. Cheap drones exemplify this, as they can be deployed in large numbers to target enemy forces, despite some being less effective. This shift in focus from expensive precision systems to massed low-cost weaponry is reshaping military strategies.
Read at www.businessinsider.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]