"Running with wet feet, in wet socks, in wet shoes is the perfect recipe for blisters. It's also a fast track to low morale. Nothing dampens spirits quicker than soaked socks. On ultra runs, I always carry spares. And when faced with wet, or even snowy, mid-winter miles, the lure of weatherproof shoes is strong. Anything that can stem the soggy tide is worth a go, right?"
"But waterproofing technology has evolved, and it might be time for a rethink. Winterized shoes can now be as light as the regular models, breathability is better, and the comfort levels have improved. Brands are also starting to add extra puddle protection to some of the most popular shoes. So it's time to ask the questions again: Just how much difference does a bit of Gore-Tex really make? Are there still trade-offs for that extra protection? And is it really worth paying the premium?"
Waterproof running shoes add barriers that keep socks drier against rain, wet grass, snow, and smaller puddles, though water can still enter if it tops the heel collar. Earlier waterproof models often felt heavier, ran hotter, and reduced overall comfort. Recent waterproofing developments have produced winterized shoes that approach the weight and breathability of regular models, with improved comfort and added puddle protection on some popular shoes. Trade-offs remain in select models, and waterproof options generally carry a price premium. Runners should balance protection needs, terrain, and comfort when deciding whether to choose waterproof shoes.
Read at WIRED
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]