"The Kayano 32 has a firm midsole consisting of only FF Blast+. It also has a silicone gel insert in its rearfoot for shock absorption. Under the arch, it has a 4D guidance system that responds to excessive load. The Saucony Hurricane 25 has a medium-soft dual-density midsole made of PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN. PWRRUN PB is a soft foam with excellent energy return while PWRRUN is a firm foam that provides support and durability."
"The Kayano with its firmer ride provides more support and stability. The Kayano feels more like a traditional stability trainer. It feels stiff and not overly soft. If you are a heavy over pronator, the Kayano is the better choice. The Kayano is better for faster paced runs. The Kayano has a stiffer forefoot and this makes it feel more snappy during transitions. The stiff forefoot helps to pick up the pace."
"The Hurricane has a plusher ride with more long-distance comfort. It feels more similar to a neutral daily trainer. The Hurricane is better for long runs and slow paces. It has more cushioning depth. When it comes to outsole durability, the Kayano wins. It has firmer exposed midsole foam which is more resistant to abrasions and chips. It also has harder outsole rubber which offers more protection for the midsole."
The Kayano 32 uses a firm FF Blast+ midsole, a silicone gel rearfoot insert for shock absorption, and a 4D guidance system under the arch to respond to excessive load. The Saucony Hurricane 25 uses a dual-density midsole with PWRRUN PB on top for softness and energy return and PWRRUN underneath for support and durability. The Kayano delivers firmer, more traditional stability with a stiffer forefoot suited to faster paces and heavy overpronation. The Hurricane offers plusher cushioning, greater long-run comfort, thicker upper padding, and deeper cushioning, while the Kayano provides superior outsole durability and breathability.
Read at Runningshoesguru
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]