In his exploration of the Liar Paradox, Slavoj Žižek draws on Jacques Lacan to differentiate between the content of a statement and the subjective stance it conveys. This distinction is crucial in understanding political discourse in our current post-truth era, where the implications of statements about deception and authenticity shape public perception. By analyzing statements like 'I am always lying,' Žižek reveals how these paradoxes inform broader political narratives, underscoring the necessity of recognizing both verbal content and the underlying subjectivity in our communication today.
In our 'post-truth' era, the practice of relying on the Liar Paradox has reached its extreme, making today's political discourse essential to understand.
The distinction between the content of an enunciation and the subjective stance implies that statements like 'I am always lying' reveal deeper truths about identity.
Collection
[
|
...
]