The article discusses why Above the Law maintains a scornful stance towards the Trump administration and its affiliates. Emphasizing that neutrality in journalism can allow harmful narratives to spread, the authors express a commitment to ethical reporting as lawyers. They argue that presenting a balanced view on topics with severe ethical implications undermines the rule of law. Rather than facilitating damaging discussions, they aim to provide straightforward reporting that reflects their learned perspectives on justice.
As writers and lawyers - we have dual ethical hangups about stopping mid-article to say, 'But on the other hand, consider the upsides of disappearing citizens into foreign slave camps.'
Collection
[
|
...
]