"Although the criticism does come with the territory, Roberts explained to Rosenthal the nature of the criticism matters. You get used to the criticism right away, he said. And it can very much be healthy. We don't believe that we are flawless in any way. It's important that our decisions are subjected to scrutiny, and they are."
"The problem sometimes is that the criticism can move from a focus on legal analysis to personalities, and you see from all over, not just any one political perspective on it, that it's more directed in a personal way, and that frankly can be actually quite dangerous."
"Judges around the country work very hard to get it right, and if they don't, their opinions are subject to criticism, he said. But, personally directed hostility is dangerous and it's got to stop."
Chief Justice John Roberts addressed the nature of judicial criticism during a speech at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. While acknowledging that criticism is inherent to the judicial role and can be healthy, Roberts emphasized that the distinction between substantive legal analysis and personal attacks matters significantly. He noted that criticism has shifted from focusing on legal reasoning to targeting personalities, a trend he observed across the political spectrum. Roberts stressed that judges work diligently to reach correct decisions and accept scrutiny of their opinions, but personally directed hostility toward judges poses a genuine danger to the judiciary and must cease.
#judicial-independence #political-attacks-on-courts #chief-justice-roberts #judicial-criticism #rule-of-law
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]