Democrats' Hidden Divide on Trump's War on Iran

"At the moment, Democrats appear largely united in opposing Trump's war as an illegal usurpation of congressional war-making authority. Yes, there are a very few Democrats in Congress (notably Congressman Greg Landsman of Ohio and Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania) who are backing the war unconditionally. But like the Republicans willing to say "no" to Trump on this war, they are isolated and largely marginal to the debate."

"There is, however, a real division emerging among Democrats about the righteousness of the war itself, legality aside, and about the administration's stated war aims of eliminating Iran's nuclear weapons program for good and toppling that country's theocratic regime."

"These measures are mostly symbolic; they will likely fail in Congress and if not, they will be vetoed by the president. Once that battle has been fought and lost, and assuming the war drags on, Democrats will need to more clearly address the basic question of how they feel about the transformed Middle East."

Trump's decision to wage war on Iran has created stress within the MAGA movement, as the conflict contradicts America First principles. Democrats are largely united in opposing the war as an illegal usurpation of congressional war-making authority, though a few Democrats like Greg Landsman and John Fetterman support it unconditionally. Republicans typically back presidential military decisions. A significant division is emerging among Democrats regarding the war's moral justification and the administration's stated objectives of eliminating Iran's nuclear weapons program and removing its theocratic regime. Congressional war powers resolutions this week are largely symbolic and likely to fail or face presidential veto. As the conflict potentially continues, Democrats must address their position on the transformed Middle East.

Read at Intelligencer