"Trump's victories are misinterpreted as evidence that moderation works, but he won by attacking the institutions blamed for societal decline, not by policy compromise."
"The moderation crowd's focus on winning back the center ignores the real grievances that produced supermajorities, leading to a narrow and flawed political strategy."
Matthew Yglesias promotes the idea that Democrats can regain working-class voters by moderating on cultural issues. This perspective misinterprets Trump's success, which stemmed from his aggressive stance against established institutions rather than policy moderation. The belief that moderation leads to electoral success overlooks the factors that actually garnered supermajorities. Yglesias's fatalistic view on AI advancements further highlights a narrow understanding of the political landscape and the real issues affecting voters.
Read at The Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]