Why the First 5 Years of Retirement Are the Most Dangerous for Your Portfolio
Briefly

Why the First 5 Years of Retirement Are the Most Dangerous for Your Portfolio
"A market downtown in the first few years of retirement, combined with regular withdrawals, can permanently damage a portfolio's ability to sustain income over time. The same downturn occurring 10 or 15 years later, when withdrawals have already been funded by earlier growth, does far less harm."
"Morningstar's 2026 State of Retirement Income research found that retirees who encountered poor returns in the first five years and didn't adjust their spending were far more likely to exhaust their savings than those who came through the early years with positive returns. In fact, roughly 70% of simulated portfolio failures were linked to losses taken in the first five years."
"During the accumulation phase, a market decline is an opportunity, and as prices drop, you keep contributing, and you buy more shares at lower prices. The moment you start withdrawing, the dynamic reverses completely. When you sell into a declining market, you lock in losses and reduce the number of shares available to participate in any recovery."
Two retirees with identical $1 million portfolios, equal annual withdrawals, and identical average returns over 30 years can experience vastly different outcomes based solely on when market downturns occur. Sequence of returns risk describes how early market declines combined with regular withdrawals permanently impair a portfolio's ability to sustain income. Morningstar research found that roughly 70% of simulated portfolio failures linked to losses in the first five years of retirement. Early losses prove more damaging than late ones because during accumulation, market declines allow continued contributions at lower prices, but during retirement, selling into declining markets locks in losses and reduces shares available for recovery.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]