The article discusses the complexities of choosing between local counsel and traveling lawyers for legal representation. While hiring local counsel can save on travel costs and streamline the process, it may involve upfront retainer payments that clients dislike. In urgent situations, such as eviction matters where immediate action is needed, relying on the client's existing lawyer may be more practical than onboarding local counsel, which can take time. Ultimately, the choice between local and traveling counsel depends on the circumstances and urgency of the case.
Clients often dislike paying advance retainers even though they can be refundable; however, a lawyer must secure their payment before taking on a new case.
In urgent situations, clients may need immediate legal action with little notice, making it impractical to onboard local counsel quickly.
Collection
[
|
...
]