"Never once in my sixty-four years has he asked how I'm actually doing. Not how my job is going or whether my bills are paid, but how I'm doing. You know, on the inside. For the longest time, I thought he was dodging the real stuff on purpose. Maybe he didn't care. Maybe he was uncomfortable with feelings. But lately, I've been thinking about it different. The man simply doesn't know how."
"His generation of men got trained to be providers and protectors. They measured their worth by what they could build, fix, or pay for. Nobody told them their kids might need something else from them. Something you can't hammer or wire or deposit in a bank. So when he asks about my job, he's not being shallow. He's trying to connect the only way he knows how—through the practical, the measurable, the concrete."
A man reflects on his sixty-four-year relationship with his father, recognizing a pattern where conversations focus exclusively on practical matters—work, vehicles, home repairs, and grandchildren's academics—but never on emotional well-being. Rather than viewing this as indifference, he realizes his father was never taught how to ask meaningful personal questions or discuss feelings. His father's generation was conditioned to measure worth through provision and problem-solving: building, fixing, and earning. This training left an emotional gap in their relationship. The father's inquiries about work represent his only known method of connection, through concrete and measurable topics. This limitation creates an unspoken distance, leaving significant portions of life unexpressed and unshared between father and son.
#intergenerational-communication #masculinity-and-emotional-expression #father-son-relationships #emotional-literacy
Read at Silicon Canals
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]