Modern Morals: I'm torn between a reliable guy who doesn't excite me and a chaotic, passionate one - who should I chose?
Briefly

Modern Morals: I'm torn between a reliable guy who doesn't excite me and a chaotic, passionate one - who should I chose?
"Should I accept that you can't always have passion? I'm dating two guys who I met on a dating app - both non-exclusively. One is solid and reliable. He organises nice dates and texts back almost immediately. He has his life together, with a good job and a strong sense of direction. He's the type of guy my mum would choose for me but he doesn't make me weak at the knees."
"One is solid and reliable. He organises nice dates and texts back almost immediately. He has his life together, with a good job and a strong sense of direction. He's the type of guy my mum would choose for me but he doesn't make me weak at the knees."
Two men met on a dating app are being dated non-exclusively. One man is solid and reliable, organizes nice dates, and replies quickly. He has a stable life, a good job, and a clear sense of direction. He fits a traditional family ideal but does not inspire intense physical or romantic excitement. The question centers on whether to accept a relationship that offers security and compatibility without delivering 'weak-at-the-knees' passion. The situation involves weighing stability, communication, and long-term goals against the desire for strong romantic chemistry.
Read at Independent
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]