In my 20s treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen' felt like power. In my 50s I see that dating strategy for what it is: fear

"In my real life, I am capable. I have interviewed politicians for the BBC. I have managed budgets. I have navigated the death of parents and the collapse of a marriage. I am a woman of substance. Yet give me a maybe from a man I met on an app, and I regress three decades. I stare at my phone. I debate the semiotics of an emoji with a girlfriend who is also a high-functioning professional."

"We play these games at 50, not because we are arrogant, but because we are convinced our real selves are simply too heavy. We have lived. We come with stretch marks and opinions. With ex-husbands and custody schedules and school WhatsApp groups that never sleep."

"There is a specific humiliation in dating at midlife that we rarely discuss: the dissonance between who we are in the world and who we become the moment a man with a nice jawline delivers the modern cruelty of the read receipt—the blue tick that confirms he saw your message, and chose silence."

The author reflects on adopting 1990s dating tactics—playing hard to get, delaying responses, maintaining emotional distance—which felt empowering in her 20s but were actually fear-based. After divorcing at 50 and entering app-based dating, she discovers these strategies persist despite her accomplished adult life. Despite professional success as a BBC interviewer and capable manager, she regresses into anxious phone-checking and analyzing silence from matches. The humiliation of midlife dating stems from the disconnect between her substantial self and her regression into insecurity. She and her peers employ these games not from arrogance but from conviction that their lived experiences—stretch marks, opinions, ex-husbands, responsibilities—make them too heavy for romantic interest.

Read at www.theguardian.com