"A recent American Enterprise Institute analysis ignited a spark. A Wall Street Journal piece that followed on the heels of the AEI report fanned the flames into a scandalous narrative: Permanent mortgage buydowns particularly those enabled by bulk forward commitments from large, mostly public, homebuilders act as a quiet force that inflates home prices and puts buyers at risk. But the assumption underlying that framing makes it worth a time-out to ask a few questions."
"In reality, at least a large percentage of the time, affordability breaks down at the monthly payment level, not at the sticker price. A recent Zelman & Associates research report The Bull Case for Mortgage Rate Buydowns offers a sharply contrasting view of homebuilders' long-standing toolbox of incentives and concessions to navigate cyclical slowdowns. Where AEI sees distortion, Zelman sees math. Where headlines see risk, Zelman sees risk put into its proper context."
Permanent mortgage buydowns funded by homebuilders are criticized as mechanisms that can inflate reported home prices and shift financing risk to taxpayer-backed entities. Concession caps established in 1985 were intended to protect valuation integrity and limit elevated credit risk. Proponents argue that buydowns often address monthly payment affordability constraints that would otherwise force buyers out of the market or require painful price cuts. The core dispute requires comparing buydowns to realistic market alternatives and measuring impacts on sticker prices, monthly payments, borrower default risk, and exposure of public mortgage insurers.
Read at www.housingwire.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]