The article discusses how vaccine hesitancy should be understood through the lens of game theory rather than merely as a result of misinformation. Highlighting the paradox that if enough parents vaccinate, others may choose not to, it shows how individual decisions based on perceived risks can endanger public health. Game theory illustrates that rational choices do not always yield the best collective outcomes, suggesting that vaccination requires a communal approach rather than only individual responsibility, underpinning the complexity of achieving herd immunity.
The decision not to vaccinate isn't simply about misinformation or hesitancy; it involves game theory, explaining how rational choices can lead to risky collective outcomes.
Vaccination decisions illustrate that when some parents choose not to vaccinate, they rely on herd immunity created by others, which can undermine public health.
Game theory shows that individually rational choices may not lead to the best outcomes for everyone, especially in the context of vaccination.
Relying solely on individual choice for vaccination can threaten collective welfare, highlighting the need for understanding vaccine decisions beyond personal opinions.
Collection
[
|
...
]