How anti-trans policies are disrupting efforts to prevent genital mutilation

"Connecticut is one of only a handful of states without a law banning female genital mutilation and cutting, a human rights violation and one of the most extreme forms of gender-based violence. FGM/C, as the practice is often abbreviated, can be done for cultural reasons or a way to exert control over sexuality. It is most often performed on young girls without their consent, has no medical value, and can result in severe medical complications like obstructed childbirth and sensory deprivation."

"In March, a Connecticut General Assembly judiciary committee hearing on proposed legislation devolved into nearly three and a half hours of hostility and confusion. A bill that would protect health care workers who prescribed gender-affirming care was up for comment at the same time. In between Coalition members testifying about their experiences, detransitioners spoke out against gender-affirming care and rallied against the shield law. Some comments supporting the FGM/C ban clearly misinterpreted it as a ban on gender-affirming care."

Connecticut is among a few states without a law banning female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C), an extreme form of gender-based violence and human-rights violation. FGM/C can be performed for cultural reasons or as a means to control sexuality, is most often carried out on young girls without consent, has no medical benefit, and can cause serious complications including obstructed childbirth and sensory deprivation. Federal prohibition exists, but advocates urge enhanced state laws that include education, civil remedies, and improved health care for survivors. The Connecticut Coalition to End FGM/C formed in 2020 and a March legislative hearing became hostile and conflated FGM/C with gender-affirming care.

Read at Advocate.com