Visual phenomena like ambiguous images, illusory shapes, and perceived motion reveal systematic vulnerabilities in human perception. Variations in light, viewing angle, mental shortcuts, and expectations can distort what appears to be objective reality. These perceptual errors affect evaluations that depend on sight, including beliefs, judgments, and memories. Viral disputes over color perception, such as the dress example, demonstrate how observers can reach different conclusions from the same stimulus. Recognition of these limitations calls for deliberate verification, critical inspection of visual evidence, and practices that reduce reliance on immediate impressions.
Optical illusions are alluring. People enjoy revealing the hidden rabbit (or duck) in the image below. They're amused to discover that they can see a triangle where there isn't one, or chaotic stirrings in an image that doesn't move. And few seem capable of visiting the Leaning Tower of Pisa and resisting the urge to take a picture of themselves propping it up.
Yet there's a sinister undertone to these playful visuals. That being: The human mind is easily fooled. Light, the angle of observation, mental shortcuts, and expectations can disfigure our perceptions of objective reality. That goes for anything that relies on perception as a potential source of evidence, such as your beliefs, judgments, and memories. For Amy Herman, art historian and author of Visual Intelligence, these and other quirks in perception signal a need for us to be more cognizant of our limitations.
In case you're lucky enough not to remember, the dress was a viral internet phenomenon in which people argued over the color of a dress. Some swore it was a black-and-blue dress, others a white-and-gold one. Some even proposed that various hues of red, silver, and brown were part of the mix. One of the most shared tweets of the moment was by Taylor Swift when she said the whole affair left her feeling "confused and scared."
Collection
[
|
...
]