"He promised "government by app" and the ability to interact with public services through a mobile phone as easily as shopping with Amazon, communicating via WhatsApp, or streaming on Netflix. "In the future, you'll be able to get all your government admin done in the time it takes to make a cup of tea," said Jones, in a video posted on social media."
"In and of itself, digital identity is an entirely benign technology. Like any technology, it becomes controversial only in the way it is implemented and used. Digital identity is not identity cards - they are fundamentally different things."
"The British cultural and political antipathy towards the concept of physical identity cards - the threat of a so-called "papers, please" society - means the mere suggestion of a government digital identity scheme has been met with protest marches, a three-million-strong petition, and outrage from privacy campaigners."
The UK government launched a consultation on a national digital identity system, with Cabinet minister Darren Jones promising seamless access to government services through mobile apps comparable to Amazon or Netflix. Digital identity technology itself is neutral, becoming controversial only through implementation and use. However, the proposal has sparked significant public opposition including protest marches and a three-million-signature petition, driven by British cultural resistance to government surveillance and fears of a "papers, please" society. The core tension reflects the Rashomon Effect: different stakeholders interpret the same initiative through conflicting narratives, leaving citizens uncertain whether to trust government intentions.
Read at ComputerWeekly.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]