The first comprehensive study of the controversial 'in-camera' rule in family law has recommended over 20 changes to enhance transparency in court proceedings. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan advocated for these recommendations, stressing public access to the justice system boosts confidence. Significant points from the study include the need to differentiate public and private information, allowing individuals to share experiences without breaching privacy laws. Testimonies highlighted how the current rules supported silence and prevented individuals from seeking necessary mental health support during challenging times.
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan emphasized the necessity for public trust in the justice system, stating the in-camera rule's secrecy raises potential issues and concerns.
The report recommends a clearer distinction between the aspects of public and private information to help people express their experiences without facing legal repercussions.
Collection
[
|
...
]