BetMGM lawsuit alleges Tennessee self-exclusion violations
Briefly

BetMGM lawsuit alleges Tennessee self-exclusion violations
"Tayip argues that despite the language in BetMGM's policy stating, 'Self-exclusion is irrevocable and binding for the entire selected duration,' he was allowed to resume wagering shortly after his removal from the state list."
"The lawsuit claims that Tayip continued placing bets from May 2023 through roughly June 2025, with total wins and losses nearing $300,000 during that stretch."
"Screenshots included in the complaint allegedly show wagers placed while Tayip's exclusion remained active, contradicting BetMGM's policy that states any wagers placed by a self-excluded user should be voided and refunded."
Dilvar Tayip filed a lawsuit against BetMGM, claiming the sportsbook ignored his self-exclusion request made on June 16, 2021. He enrolled in both Tennessee's voluntary self-exclusion list and BetMGM's program, which should have prevented him from betting until June 16, 2026. Tayip alleges that after being removed from the state list in May 2023, BetMGM allowed him to gamble again, resulting in nearly $300,000 in bets. He argues that BetMGM's policy states self-exclusion is irrevocable and that his wagers should have been voided and refunded.
Read at ReadWrite
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]