The ethics of cloning and owning dogs | Letters
Briefly

Luiz Hoinkis' $50,000 decision to clone his dog highlights a concerning trend in the pet cloning industry, suggesting society may view animals as replaceable rather than recognizing their unique qualities. This perception diminishes the individuality and irreplaceable perspectives of sentient animals. Additionally, the letter urges a critical examination of the increasing dog population in the UK and calls for guidance on living without pets to help address environmental concerns, emphasizing a need for deeper ethical considerations in our relationships with animals.
Luiz Hoinkis' decision to clone his dog, while reflecting a love for animals, may indicate a troubling tendency to view them as replaceable objects instead of unique individuals.
The growing pet-cloning industry raises ethical concerns about our perception of animals, suggesting that we may be misvaluing the irreplaceable perspectives that each sentient being offers.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]