"For HR tech and LMS vendors, sales performance is shaped less by effort and more by market structure. Buyers do not move quickly. Decisions are rarely owned by a single role. Budgets are planned far in advance and scrutinized by finance, IT, legal, and procurement. Even when a solution is clearly needed, momentum can stall for reasons that have nothing to do with product quality or sales skill."
"This is where many generic SaaS sales goal frameworks fall apart. Mainly, it is because they tend to assume fast feedback loops, simple buyer journeys, and predictable deal velocity. However, HR software and learning platforms in the market do not behave this way. Instead, they are deeply embedded in organizational processes, compliance requirements, and employee experience. Therefore, replacing them is disruptive, risky, and political."
HR software and LMS sales are governed by long buying cycles, multiple stakeholders, planned budgets, and extensive scrutiny from finance, IT, legal, and procurement. Generic SaaS sales frameworks fail because they assume fast feedback, simple buyer journeys, and predictable deal velocity. Replacing HR systems is disruptive, risky, and political, causing stalled momentum despite clear need. Achievable sales goals require operational realism: align targets to buying behavior, measure pipeline quality over speed, qualify deals against organizational constraints, and build trust through prolonged nurture. Forecasting should reflect decision complexity, and strategies should prioritize repeatable processes over optimistic velocity assumptions.
Read at eLearning Industry
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]