The article details a pre-trial Frye hearing regarding suspected serial killer Rex Heuermann, focusing on whether nuclear DNA evidence linking him to the Gilgo Beach murders can be admitted in court. Defense attorney Michael Brown argued that the acceptance of scientific principles in academic circles can differ from their acceptance in a courtroom context. Judge Timothy Mazzei asserted his authority to decide on admissibility, emphasizing the importance of the Frye standard in determining the scientifically accepted methods that can influence legal proceedings. The outcome of this hearing could shape the trial's trajectory significantly.
The Frye hearing will determine the court admissibility of nuclear DNA evidence, allegedly linking Rex Heuermann to multiple murders, depending on its acceptance in the scientific community.
Heuermann's defense attorney questioned whether the relevant scientific principles accepted in academic circles translate to court admissibility, indicating a divide between scientific acceptance and judicial standards.
Judge Timothy Mazzei emphasized that it is ultimately his decision to determine the admissibility of evidence, highlighting the importance of the Frye hearing.
The defense argued that a single instance of DNA evidence's use in court does not suffice to classify it as widely accepted within the necessary scientific community.
Collection
[
|
...
]