OpenTelemetry vs. Deep Runtime Telemetry: Which Is Better for Your Node.js Stack?
Briefly

OpenTelemetry vs. Deep Runtime Telemetry: Which Is Better for Your Node.js Stack?
"If you're running Node.js in production, you've likely heard the buzz around OpenTelemetry. It's the industry standard for observability, backed by major vendors, and it promises vendor-neutral telemetry collection across your entire stack. For many teams, it's a game-changer: finally, a unified way to collect traces, metrics, and logs without getting locked into a single vendor's ecosystem. But here's the thing: OpenTelemetry wasn't built specifically for Node.js."
"It provides automatic instrumentation for Node.js applications with minimal code changes, collecting traces, metrics, and logs through a standardized, vendor-neutral SDK. You instrument once and export to any backend: Datadog, New Relic, Honeycomb, Grafana, or your own custom solution. Distributed tracing across services - OTel excels at showing you how requests flow through your microservices architecture. You can see exactly which service is slowing down your API response times."
OpenTelemetry delivers vendor-neutral observability with automatic instrumentation, standardized traces, metrics, and logs, and easy export to multiple backends. OpenTelemetry excels at distributed tracing, correlating signals, and broad ecosystem support for common Node frameworks. Its platform-agnostic design simplifies multi-vendor workflows and rapid adoption. Node.js production problems such as load-only memory leaks, event-loop delays, and unexplained CPU spikes often require engine-level visibility. Deep Runtime Telemetry captures low-level runtime metrics and engine internals that OpenTelemetry may miss, enabling root-cause diagnosis of Node-specific performance issues. Use OpenTelemetry for service-level visibility and Deep Runtime Telemetry for runtime-level debugging.
[
|
]