The article explores fan biases in evaluating players, specifically focusing on the differing perceptions between Chris Kreider and Mika Zibanejad. It highlights how personal standards, emotional attachments, and fan culture can skew opinions. The author admits to being overly critical of Kreider due to high expectations and contrasting fan support. The piece raises questions about whether fans focus on negatives or positives when judging player performances, revealing the complexities of fandom and the subjective nature of player evaluations.
In the wake of the Chris Kreider trade, it got me thinking about why certain parts of this fanbase clings to Kreider like a life raft, but will be so willing to cast out other players like Mika Zibanejad after a down year.
Do we only remember the negative? Are we blinded by the positives to the point where we can't see the flaws in someone's game?
Collection
[
|
...
]